多年來奔騰處理器的名稱和所謂型別千變萬化，要知道它們之間的區別可能有點混亂。有鑑於此，今天的超級使用者問答帖子對一位好奇的讀者提出的關於有編號和無編號奔騰處理器的問題給出了一些答案。

今天的問答環節是由SuperUser提供的，SuperUser是Stack Exchange的一個分支，是一個由社群驅動的問答網站分組。

問題

超級使用者讀者user16973想知道編號奔騰處理器和非編號奔騰處理器之間的區別：

I noticed some older CPUs are branded as Pentium(n) (Pentium followed by a number), but there are some relatively new computers on shelves that just say Pentium without a number. Are those processors similar or do they just share the same name?

這兩種奔騰處理器有什麼區別？

答案

超級使用者貢獻者Rich Homolka為我們提供了答案：

Short Answer: Yes, there is a difference. They are all part of the x86 line-up though, and post i486, they were a marketing name for Intel chips.

In the early days of computing, IBM wanted multiple sources for their chips and Intel allowed AMD to make a limited number of 386 chips. When the 486 came out, clones were big enough that Intel did not need worry about IBM as much, but they also did not want to share the pie with AMD. They started calling their chips i486 and tried to get a trademark for i486. The courts laughed at them (going to trademark a letter?). So Intel tried to come up with a marketing name.

The trade-markable name Pentium was born from that change in marketing tactics (the root, Penta, meaning 5). This was their 586. There were other 586s, including Cyrix’s 5×86, which had (in some ways) a more advanced micro-architecture (the 5×86 broke down x86 instructi*** to RISC like micro-ops in much the same way chips do now).

That was the 586, so what name could they use for the next generation? Call the new 686 Sextium? Obviously bad. Perhaps Hexium? Not going to go there with Hex in the name.

So they went with the name Pentium Pro. Their first 686 was an extension of the marketing name for the 5th generation 586s. The next one after that? Well, Pentium II, then Pentium III. These are all 686 architectures.

Then, they went to Pentium 4. Why 4? Maybe they did not like choosing between IV or IIII.

This was a new generation, essentially their 786. They went all-in on the MHz race and made a new clock friendly architecture called Netburst. Very very deep pipelines, but it did not perform well. If those pipelines stalled (and not if, but when they stalled), you spent a lot of time trying to empty, then refill them. In CPU power for watts, it did not work as well as the Pentium M, which was a Pentium III based product. Intel kind of backtracked and did not follow the Netburst line much after that, though some other Pentium 4 features were added to the other chips.

Soon after, they started a new line of marketing names, like Centrino, Core, Core Duo, etc.

So, the original Pentium naming scheme stretches across three distinct generati*** of x86:

• 586: Pentium, Pentium MMX
• 686: Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III, Pentium M
• 786: Pentium 4

So, if you see something named Pentium, and it is in the single digit megabytes of RAM, and double digit megabytes of hard drive space, it may be an original Pentium.

Anything more recent than this is using Pentium as a pure marketing name. Since Pentium is trademarked, you are essentially calling it an Intel x86 computer. More recent chips are well past Pentium 4 in architecture (Pentium is only a brand now), connoting Intel Inside and giving no more info than that. The current uses of Pentium as a brand name seem to be on the lower end. Anything that is Core series or i3,5,7 series gets listed as that, anything left over may get Pentium.

有什麼要補充的解釋嗎？在評論中發出聲音。想從其他精通技術的Stack Exchange使用者那裡瞭解更多答案嗎？在這裡檢視完整的討論主題。