今晚，******《世界新闻》播出了对苹果首席执行官蒂姆·库克的采访，谈话的焦点是iPhone**商和联邦当局之间正在进行的加密战。但事实证明，观众在电视上看到的只是一小部分；全程面试只有不到半个小时。在这种长时间、不间断的交流中，很少见到库克。

他承认，苹果拒绝向联邦调查局（FBI）让步，实际上是在违背民意。”他说：“这与民意测验无关。”库克告诉大卫·缪尔，他收到了许多来自公众的“温馨”信件，包括退伍军人，鼓励苹果坚守阵地。他还对一些最糟糕的情况表示担忧，隐私权倡导者认为，这些情况可能源于苹果对**要求的屈服。

If a court can ask us to write this piece of software, think about what else they could ask us to write. Maybe it’s an operating system for surveillance. Maybe it’s the ability for law enforcement to turn on the camera. I mean, I don’t know where this stops. But I do know this is not what should be happening in this country. This is not what should be happening in America. If there should be a law that compels us to do it, it should be passed out in the open, and the people of America should get a voice in that. The right place for that debate to occur is in Congress.

以下是其他摘录，但整个采访-库克自己的办公室内拍摄-绝对值得一看。库克透露，他打算与奥巴马总统就正在进行的案件进行会谈，他说“我将寻求他的帮助，让这件事走上更好的道路。”

No one would want a master key built that would turn hundreds of milli*** of locks. Even if that key were in the possession of the person that you trust the most, that key could be stolen. That is what this is about.

It’s clear that it would be a precedent. New York law enforcement is already talking about having 175 phones there. Other counties across the United States are talking about phones they have. And so it is a slippery slope. I don’t fear it; it is one.

Cook: I know people like to frame this argument as privacy versus national security. That is overly simplistic and is not true. This is also about public safety. The **artphone that you carry has more information about you on it than probably any other singular device or any other singular place.

Muir: So this is about protecting the safety of the people who carry those iPhones?

Cook: That’s exactly right. And by the way, it’s probably just not iPhone. Because if the government could order Apple to create such a piece of software, it could be ordered for anyone else as well. It doesn’t stop here.

Think about this. It is, in our view, the software equivalent of cancer. Is this something that should be created? Technology can do so many things. But there are many things technology should never be allowed to do. And the way you not allow it, is to not create it.

关于iPhone为何拥有如此深度的加密：

Cook: Hacking has become increasingly commonplace. It is very difficult to secure data, and the everyday person can’t do it. They look for Apple to help them do it. You need to look no further than the government, which has had some of the worst breaches of all in this case. And so yes, security gets better with every software release we have. Encryption gets more advanced. It has to to stay one step ahead of the bad guys.

Muir: So it’s not a mistake that we can’t get into Syed Farook’s iPhone?

Cook: We didn’t do it for that reason, David. We did it to protect our customers. But yes, a side effect means that Apple can’t get to it either. Think of it like this: if you put a door in a house, it’s a lot easier to get in that house. It doesn’t matter whether it’s locked or not. Somebody can get in that. And so our simple view is that you encrypt end to end, and you don’t keep a key. And so the people that can see communicati*** are the people on either end of that communication.

根据FBI的具体要求：

Cook: What they want is, they want us to develop a new operating system that takes out the security precauti***. Including the precaution that, after 10 tries, if somebody has set "erase all data after 10," they want that to not be in there. And then they want an ability to go through a number of passwords at the speed of a modern computer.

Muir: A computer would do that to figure out the code..

Cook: A computer would do that. We believe that is a very dangerous operating system

Muir: Because once people know that exists, you say, the cat is out of the bag.

Cook: If one of the bad guys knew that that existed, think about the target that is. Everybody would want that system. Because you could get in… It has the potential to get into any iPhone. This is not something that should be created.

在前进的道路上：

America is strongest when we all come together. There are great people in the FBI and the DoJ and in government — incredible public servants. There’s also some really **art people in technology, and there are some really great people focused on civil liberties. All of these groups need to come together. We’ve recommended a commission; I would be okay with it being called something else or done in a different way. But the key is for all of the key people to come together and really think through these issues. But not just look at one — look at all of them and recognize that at the core of this are some of the founding principles of our country, which we should take a huge pause to trample on.

关于最高**决战的可能性：

Cook: We would be prepared to take this issue all the way. Yes. Because I think it’s that important for America. This should not be decided court by court by court. If you decide that it’s okay to force a company to do something that they think is bad for hundreds of milli*** of people, then… Think about this for a minute. And this case is an awful case; there is no worse case than this case. But there may a judge in a different district that feels that this case should apply to a divorce case. There may be one in the next state over that thinks it should apply in a tax case. Another state over it might apply in a robbery. And so you begin to say, ‘Wait a minute. This isn’t how this should happen.’ If there is going to be a law, then it should be done out in the open for people so their voices are heard through their representatives in Congress.

Muir: And if Congress decided that there’s this **all category — this was a terrorist’s iPhone. If Congress decided that, if the American people signed off on that, you’d entertain it?

Cook: Let me be clear. At the end of the day, we have to follow the law. Just like everybody else, we have to follow the law. What is going on right now is we’re having our voices be heard. And I would encourage everyone who wants to have a voice and wants to have an opinion to make sure their voice is heard.