包括电子前沿基金会（Electronic Frontier Foundation）、访问（Access）、自由新闻（Free Press）和人权观察（Human Rights Watch）在内的人权组织也加入了反对Twitter最近对Politwoops的镇压行动的行列，Politwoops是一个网站网络，该网络将全球政界人士删除的推文存档。该联盟在一封***中说，Twitter的禁令“对全世界的****和透明度造成严重后果”

“信息权、****权和隐私权保护人们，使他们能够让权贵承担责任，”开放国家基金会执行董事阿扬·法塞德（Arjan El Fassed）在一份声明中说；开放国家基金会是总部设在荷兰的Politwoops组织通过屏蔽Politwoops，Twitter决定放弃这些价值观，只有权贵才会受益。”

“想象一下，如果推特是不可改变和不可撤销的，那么它会多么伤脑筋——可怕，甚至是——推特会是什么样？”推特当时以解释的方式告诉开放国家基金会没有一个用户比另一个用户更值得拥有这种能力。事实上，删除一条微博是用户声音的一种表达。”但在今天的信中，联盟反驳了这种说法，称其“将透明度、问责制与隐私混为一谈”

"We agree that when users decide to delete tweets they are engaging in expression — but add that the public has a compelling interest in the expression of public officials. Recognizing this public interest, courts have long held that public officials do not receive the same treatment for privacy. Further, when public officials use Twitter to amplify their political views, they invite greater scrutiny of their expression. Journalists and civil society utilize tools like Politwoops to understand the views and commitments of the people these politicians represent — and the politician or candidate's own intents and perspective. In this case, the citizen's right to freedom of expression — which includes access to information — outweighs the official's right to a retroactive edit."

该联盟要求Twitter立即恢复对Politwoops的API访问，并更新其开发者政策，以明确支持公众利益的透明度。这封信的全部签名人名单是Access、Alternatif Bilisim、Art 34 bis、Asociacion por los Derechos Civiles、Blueprint for Free Speech、Derechos Digitales、Electronic Frontier Foundation、Free Press、Human Rights Watch、Jinbonet、OpenMedia International、Open State Foundation、Paradigm Initiative、Pirate Party、，红卫兵和阳光基金会。